RESEARCH _________________________ |
The
muscle-like nature of the brain's movement commands
|
The motor cortex is the major source of
the brain's commands that control voluntary reaching and grasping
movements. As these commands descend to motor neurons in the spinal
cord, they need to be coordinated with similar commands from several
brainstem structures. In animal subjects, one can record signals from
individual neurons in these areas during movement. Since the pioneering
experiments of Ed Evarts in the mid 1960s, a mainstay of motor systems
research has been the comparison of the discharge of neurons in the
central nervous system (CNS) with various movement related signals.
Covariation of neuronal discharge with some parameter of the movement
is often taken as evidence to suggest that that neuron encodes (or
controls) that aspect of the movement. One of the foremost questions
is that of the coordinate system, or "language" of these
movement commands within any given brain area. These commands may,
for example, encode some aspect of a desired hand movement, possibly
its direction, speed, or extent. Alternatively, they might encode
the sequence and magnitude of muscle activity necessary to execute
a desired movement.
Since the early 1980s, the hand-centered view of the primary motor
cortex (M1) has been predominant, following a now classic series of
experiments which showed that the strength of the movement-related
activity depends on the direction in which an experimental monkey
moves its hand. This result was interpreted to mean that the command
to execute a particular hand movement is expressed by M1 neurons in
the simple Cartesian coordinate system commonly used to describe positions
in terms of the x, y, and z coordinates of three-dimensional space.
If correct, this model requires that neurons of the spinal cord transform
this simple Cartesian space command into the more complex "muscle
space" command actually required to produce the movement. Research
in my laboratory has cast doubt on this model.
One important result of that research was the demonstration that the
signals produced by single neurons in a brainstem motor area called
the magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) closely resemble muscle activity,
particularly the distal extensor muscles of the hand. In other words,
these red nucleus signals express their movement commands in muscle
space. These findings required a fundamental rethinking of the role
of spinal circuitry because they strongly support the hypothesis that
the spinal cord does not transform descending motor commands from
Cartesian space to muscle space.
Several years ago Dr. Klaus-Peter Hoffmann, Chairman of the Department
of Biology and Neurobiology, of the Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany
discovered a remarkable set of cells in the deep layers of the superior
colliculus, in some ways analogous to the RNm cells. The superior
colliculus has been known for many years to control the direction
of eye and head orienting movements. However, these collicular "reach"
cells appeared not to be related to eye movements, but rather to limb
movements. Through a collaborative project with Dr. Hoffmanns' lab,
we discovered that like RNm, the discharge of these neurons were well
correlated with muscle activity. Unlike RNm, these cells were best
correlated with muscles of the proximal limb and shoulder girdle.
These findings strongly suggest that the superior colliculus is involved
in directing the limb toward a target, in much the way the majority
of its neurons direct gaze movements. This discovery was particularly
important in that it identified a brainstem area that was complementary
to the distal limb control provided by the more familiar red nucleus.
More recently, experiments in my laboratory led to the discovery that
the portions of the motor cortex which control the distal limb and
hand do so by commands that appear to be expressed in a muscle space,
very much like those of the red nucleus. We have also shown that it
is possible to model the time-course of muscle activity using signals
recorded from multiple motor cortical neurons. Most of the experiments
to date have, out of technological necessity, involved a relatively
modest number of simultaneously recorded neurons. However, we have
begun to use a chronically implanted, state-of-the-art array of 100
electrodes, that is expected to yield simultaneous recordings of much
larger numbers of neurons.
Taken together, these results have demonstrated that many of the spinal
projecting motor areas in both the brainstem and cerebral cortex provide
a command to spinal neurons that is closely related to the time-course
of muscle activity. Intriguingly however, they run counter to the
theory suggesting that motor cortex neurons control the proximal arm
by generating signals that encode the desired hand movement in Cartesian
coordinates. Several theoretical studies from other labs have suggested
that the interpretation of earlier experimental results which led
to the Cartesian space model may not have been correct. We are currently
running experiments focused on the proximal arm area of motor cortex
in an attempt to resolve this apparent paradox.
|
|